Shaping the Future of the Internet of Bodies: New challenges of technology governance
My work for the past 4 years has been to alert the world about the presence of self assembly nanotechnology in human blood posing an existential threat to what it means to be human. Information that should have been shared worldwide, has been censored, suppressed, laughed at and criticized. Most outspoken critics were doctors and scientists who said they knew better. They laughed at live blood analysis showing these nano and microrobotic biosensors swimming in everyone’s blood and said live blood analysis is not scientific. Similar to Galileo who was prosecuted as a heretic for daring to say that the earth revolves around the sun, the concept of self assembly nanotechnology – despite overwhelming evidence – was negated and still is to an unacceptable degree. Every human being in the world should be informed about this threat and every media outlet should discuss its immediate implications for the survival of our species.
How much time has been lost to humanity to not only work on antidotes but also to have an informed discussion about their willingness to participate in the Internet of Bodies? The simple scientific fact that synthetic biology and nanotechnology exists, as well as the written and declared intentions of the transhumanist technocrats and the military has been ignored. The lesson of this fundamental error in thinking should be heeded as WISDOM while we are on the brink of UFO Disclosure, AI Singularity and the rise to power of the Silicon Valley Technocrats who have assembled behind President Trump. As these technologies are being deployed non stop, our freedoms are under assault by an invisible nanotechnological surveillance sensor network under the disguise of health benefits and progress. This is the infrastructure of the One World Order.
As always, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH.
2020 was the year declared by the WEF – that the Internet of Bodies is here.
The internet of things (IoT) is increasingly entangling with human bodies. This emergence and fast expansion of the “internet of bodies” (IoB)2 – the network of human bodies and data through connected sensors – while offering enormous social and health benefits, also raises new challenges of technology governance. – WEF 2020
____________________________________________________________________________
The COVID19 bioweapon technology was that platform. IEEE engineer Professor Ian Akyildiz – and one of the principal engineers of the Intrabody area network, metaverse, 6,7,8, G technologies, nanotechnology biosening electronics and global satellite control grid network including nano satellites said it himself:
Scientists were claiming that the reality of COVID19 was the mRNA and spike protein and harmless lipid nanoparticles. They completely ignored the dual purposes in which each of the building blocks could also be used as biosensors. The lipid nanoparticles literally had been engineered to create computers and robots that can manipulate and fuse with our cells.
PERCEPTION RESET 