The World Economic Forum (WEF) is demanding that government regulators and tech firms around the world grant the unelected globalist organization the authority to police the public’s speech online.

The WEF is seeking to regulate speech by defining which language should be censored.

Klaus Schwab and his allies want to dictate to regulators, social media companies, and other tech firms, their definitions for what constitutes “hate speech,” “misinformation,” or disinformation.”

Interestingly, the WEF makes no mention of cracking down on speech that could be linked to serious crimes such as terrorism or child abuse, nor does the organization mention targeting false information.

Apparently, the WEF is more concerned with cracking down on political speech or information that may undermine its agenda.

The calls come as the WEF continues to push for more control over the flow of information online.

The Switzerland-based group has repeatedly made calls for the policing of unapproved speech through artificial intelligence (AI) or online censorship.

Schwab and global elite allies have repeatedly shown interest in controlling speech, and therefore the official narrative, online.

When it comes to justifying online censorship, Big Tech’s social platforms frequently use vague terms to justify deleting and censoring content, describing the “offending” information as “misinformation” or  “hate speech.”

They never explain, however, who makes such decisions, based on what authority.

To censor so-called “misinformation,” social media companies such as Facebook use “fact checkers,” who are typically failed left-wing journalists who seek to smear more successful reporters who report on subjects that conflict with their own weak-minded political views.

With loosely defined boundaries, “fact checkers” can censor information that falls into the categories of “disinformation” or “misinformation” without ever having to prove that it is false.

Not least because of this lack of clarity, many people suspect that these sites avoid explaining themselves because there is nothing to explain.

Read More